|
Scrapes
Oct 24, 2007 19:59:03 GMT -6
Post by redmist on Oct 24, 2007 19:59:03 GMT -6
Does anyone believe this? It was published in a prominant hunting magazine in November of 2006. Ive always been taught not to let any kind of human scent near a scrape at all. Tell me what you think.
Whiz in a Scrape? This is no joke.
Missouri biologist Dr. Grant Woods and his associates have taken tens of thousands of trail-camera photographs over the years, with many of their best shots coming at scrapes in the rut.
So what’s the best stuff to lure deer to those scrapes? Hot doe? Buck tarsal?
Nah, your pee!
The researchers have found that scrapes created or doctored with human urine produce the most buck sightings and, get this, the most mature buck sightings. Woods notes that it happens more often than random chance can account for.
So forget your pee bottle (whiz right off your stand, I do).
And try this before the rut is done: Paw a 5-foot circle deep into the dirt 20 yards or so upwind of your stand (farther if you’re gun hunting, but still in sight). Build your faux scrape beneath an overhanging limb and snap the tip of the stick 3 to 4 feet off the ground like deer do.
Then, well, you know what to do next. When you’re done whizzing, zip up, climb up and watch for a big boy to come check you out.
Each day you come back to hunt that stand, doctor your scent-post again till it really reeks.
Posted on November 17, 2006 in Deer/Outdoor Oddities
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 25, 2007 18:28:00 GMT -6
Post by redmist on Oct 25, 2007 18:28:00 GMT -6
Is this something you would try, or are you like me and think that it would destroy one of your prime huntin' spots?
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 25, 2007 23:09:24 GMT -6
Post by thecoleman on Oct 25, 2007 23:09:24 GMT -6
i think i would have to see the research for myself before i did anything like that
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 26, 2007 1:14:41 GMT -6
Post by redmist on Oct 26, 2007 1:14:41 GMT -6
I still don't know if I believe it. Been hunting deer for 25 years now. It goes against everything Ive learned so far.
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 26, 2007 2:26:42 GMT -6
Post by thecoleman on Oct 26, 2007 2:26:42 GMT -6
thats why i need to see the research
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 26, 2007 3:49:42 GMT -6
Post by redmist on Oct 26, 2007 3:49:42 GMT -6
Call Dr. Woods. (ask him if I can hunt his properties)
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 26, 2007 21:20:00 GMT -6
Post by thecoleman on Oct 26, 2007 21:20:00 GMT -6
so you can smell the mans pee whats wrong with you
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 28, 2007 17:03:41 GMT -6
Post by redmist on Oct 28, 2007 17:03:41 GMT -6
I have a 10 month. I smell human pee constantly. he,he,he
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 28, 2007 17:15:56 GMT -6
Post by thecoleman on Oct 28, 2007 17:15:56 GMT -6
true but thats a little differnt
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 28, 2007 17:20:51 GMT -6
Post by redmist on Oct 28, 2007 17:20:51 GMT -6
pee is pee, brudda
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 28, 2007 18:46:51 GMT -6
Post by ECHIV on Oct 28, 2007 18:46:51 GMT -6
I have a two year five month old who lets me smell A LOT WORSE THAN PEE. Sometimes more than once a day. When we ran Bear Baits in Alaska we always peed on the bait pile. Bears do it to let other bears know they were visiting. We figured it got them used to our smell. Never heard of doing that for whtetails though.
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 28, 2007 20:29:20 GMT -6
Post by redmist on Oct 28, 2007 20:29:20 GMT -6
I've heard of the bear thing, good to hear that works.
I just don't think a deer would be interested in my pee.
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 28, 2007 22:04:02 GMT -6
Post by thecoleman on Oct 28, 2007 22:04:02 GMT -6
it might get them used to it or chase them away i dont want to risk it
|
|
|
Scrapes
Oct 29, 2007 10:31:48 GMT -6
Post by redmist on Oct 29, 2007 10:31:48 GMT -6
nor do I.
Maybe I should start selling bottles of my pee to people that follow Dr. Woods' theory.
|
|